Battle-tested over novel
We choose frameworks with large ecosystems, active maintenance, and long support horizons. A technology that is interesting today but unmaintained in three years is a liability transferred to you.
Engineering Capabilities
Our Core Technology Stack
We select battle-tested, maintainable frameworks to avoid technical lock-in — and we can explain why each one is on this list.
Frontend
Component-driven, typed, and server-rendered where it helps Core Web Vitals — so interfaces stay fast as they grow.
- React.js
- Next.js
- Vue.js
- TypeScript
- Tailwind CSS
Backend
Mature runtimes with strong ecosystems and long support horizons, chosen to match your team's existing skills rather than our preferences.
- Node.js
- Python
- Laravel
- .NET Core
- PostgreSQL
Mobile & Cloud
One mobile codebase across both platforms, deployed on infrastructure that scales with demand instead of standing idle.
- Flutter
- React Native
- AWS
- Docker
- Azure
Testing & DevOps
The tooling behind our QA-first methodology — the reason regressions are caught by the pipeline rather than by your customers.
- Playwright
- Selenium
- Postman
- Jira
- GitHub Actions
Selection Criteria
How We Decide What To Build On
Your team's skills matter more than our preferences
If your engineers know Laravel, building your platform in something they cannot maintain is a bad trade regardless of benchmarks. We select from this stack based on who will own the system after handover.
No technical lock-in
We avoid proprietary abstractions that make leaving expensive. Standard interfaces, containerised deployment, and infrastructure as code mean you can move providers — or engineering partners — without a rewrite.
Initiate Project
Not Sure Which Stack Fits Your Problem?
Bring us the constraints — team, budget, timeline, existing systems — and we will recommend an approach, including when the answer is to keep what you have.
No sales pitch • Speak directly with an engineer • Strict NDA available